Home
Case Studies
Cost Savings Opportunities
Distribution Center Optimization
Logistics Network Design
Client List & References
Tim VandeMerkt's Bio
Contact
   
 


Situation

A $40M Toronto-based wholesale apparel distributor had outgrown it's Distribution Center (DC) and headquarters facility, and was in the process of planning a move to a new, larger facility nearby. Their business operates primarily as a catalogue/e-commerce fulfillment platform, with ~7,000 active skus and another ~4,000 inactive skus. Over 80% of orders shipped are "pick-pack", miscellaneous item orders. The current DC occupied a total of 135,000 ft2, comprised of a 110,000 ft2 primary building (attached to headquarters) and a 25,000 ft2 supplemental building in the same industrial park. The new DC was planned to be a total of 135,000 ft2, all in one contiguous space.

Focus Areas & Results

Order-Picking Area:

Began review with sku velocity analysis at the order-level

  • Determined that ~900 skus drove >65% of the picking activity

Used data above to build recommendation to integrate a "fast-pick" area in a two area pick-and-pass process to optimize productivity

Also used findings to support:

  • Recommendation for a strong slotting/bin profiling initiative
  • Recommendation to develop a full case fast-pick area as well
  • Development of productivity projections by area and compared to historical actuals

Coordinated autocad/engineering resource to build layout including three primary picking areas as noted above

  • Modeled several versions to insure various and general capacities

        (pallet positions, pick-facings, etc.) given the overall space acquired (5 year model)

Projected productivity increase of 100% (35 LPH to 70+ LPH), for an annual savings of >$264K

  • Quality expected to improve >10% as we transitioned to sophisticated slotting 

Check/Pack/Ship Area:

Current process was manual and involved 100% checking pick-pack orders

Designed process and layout which included automated/power conveyor diverts (by carrier/mode), automated print-apply label application, semi-automated taping machine, and flexible conveyor for fluid/continuous truck-loading.

Also developed a recommendation to decrease order checking to focus on those orders "most likely" to contain an error (historically difficult merchandise; new/temporary employees; etc.)

Projected productivity to increase by 100% (eliminating 3 of the 5 employees involved) for a savings of ~$100K.

Miscellaneous Operational Changes:

Returns Processing

  • Process and layout changes recommended
  • Projected savings >$5K

Cycle Counting

  • Recommended eliminating bi-annual physical inventories in lieu of robust cycle counting
  • Although cycle counting was limited, they were doing both.
  • Built a recommended cycle counting regimen they were to review with external auditors
  • Projected savings >$10K

Flexible Labor Staffing

  • Were only using full-time staff (regular and temporary)
  • Recommended use of part-time employees and staggering more of outbound shift work
  • Projected savings >$20K

Corrugated Recycling

  • Were using 100% new, company-branded cartons for outbound orders
  • Recommended re-use of a specific size of vendor inbound cartons that matched size
  • Projected savings >$18K

Coordinated mini-RFP using three material handling integrators

Recommended company develop an inactive inventory disposal process internally BEFORE they moved to new location, and then invest in Product Life Cycle Management (PLM) training and system implementation to insure optimal area results going forward.

Overall/Final Results

Company opened new facility in March 2010 with:

  • Sufficient capacity to service their articulated 5 year business plan
  • Much-improved operating capacity through automation and segmentation of work areas
  • A much more efficient process (>$414K in expense savings; >$396K in payroll savings)
  • A higher quality process from slotting/bin profiling focus results

Broader project work there also resulted in:

  • >$157K (14.3%) savings in outbound small package transportation cost
  • Primarily gained through provider changes, pricing reductions, and process changes
  • >$101K (10.1%) savings in international inbound transportation cost
  • Primarily gained through provider changes and pricing reductions